Legal Opinion

Metz v. Haskell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1966No. 9519Published

1Opinion of the Court

417 P.2d 898 (1966)

Mearl R. METZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Elden J. HASKELL, dba Holiday Motel, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 9519.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

September 8, 1966.

May & May, Twin Falls, for appellant.

Parry, Robertson & Daly and Kramer, Walker, Pope & Plankey, Twin Falls, for respondent.

McQUADE, Justice.

This appeal is from an order granting a summary judgment in favor of the defendant-respondent, Elden J. Haskell, dba Holiday Motel, at Twin Falls. For consideration of a motion for summary judgment, on appeal this court views the evidence in that light most favorable to the appellant and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Deshazer v. TompkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Jack v. FillmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Sutton v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Williams v. CollettIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Metz v. HaskellIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API