Legal Opinion

Eberhart v. Kurtz

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided July 23, 1986No. Civ. 5295-XPublished

1Opinion of the Court

BRADLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order of a remittitur or, alternatively, a new trial.

This action began when Randall Chambers, Susan Chambers, and Nick Gorham filed a complaint against Jack Kurtz. They alleged that Kurtz had obstructed a roadway which was the sole ingress to and egress from to their property. Later the complaint was amended to add I.W. Eber-hart as a party defendant. The amendment stated that Eberhart was the predecessor in title to the realty and that he had represented that the plaintiffs would have free and unlimited access by the existing road.

Eberha…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shiloh Const. Co., Inc. v. Mercury Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Todd v. United Steelworkers of AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Williams v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Merkle v. Armstrong ex rel. ArmstrongCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API