Legal Opinion

Smith v. Haire

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1917PublishedCited by 13 opinions

PROM MONROE. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Monroe County. —Foss H. Meeger, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lonsden

This suit was brought by certain attorneys to recover their fees for services rendered in the contest of the will of J. T. M. Haire, deceased. There is no question made as to the amount of the fees claimed, nor as to the fact of proper services having been rendered by the attorneys. The question presented is whether the attorneys for the successful contestants of a will are entitled to payment of their fees out of the estate as part of the expenses of adminstration.

A brief statement of the ease is that Mr. Haire died in July, 1912, leaving two paper writings purporting to be his last, will…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. HaireTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lassiter v. TravisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Weed's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Louisville Presbyterian Theo. Sem. v. BottoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carmack v. Fidelity-Bankers Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Marshall v. Sevier CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Gillespie v. Federal Compress & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1953
  5. Vanderbilt University v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API