Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 6, 1976No. 20145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

We are presented with the issue of whether a trial judge may, during the pendency of an action against the respondent for driving under the influence, issue an ex parte restraining order to the State Highway Department restraining it from suspending respondent’s driving license until the disposition of another case involving a different defendant.

Respondent was arrested on October 13, 1974, while driving under the influence of intoxicants. He refused to submit to a breathalyzer test in accordance with the Implied Consent Law (S. C. Code § 46-344) after being properly advised.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ishmell v. South Carolina Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Brandt Ex Rel. Estate of Brandt v. GoodingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. City of Columbia v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Horn v. Davis Electrical Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API