Legal Opinion

Southeastern Financial Corporation v. John Smith

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1976No. 75-3203PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to the enlightened and invaluable provisions of Ala. Const, art. 5, § 140(b)(3) (1901, Amended 1973), we certified three controlling questions of undetermined Alabama law to the Supreme Court of that state. Southeastern Financial Corp. v. Smith, 526 F.2d 1233 (5th Cir. 1976). That Court’s answers to our questions in Smith v. Southeastern Financial Corp., Ala., 337 So.2d 330 (1976) have made the discharge of our Erie responsibility clear and easy. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938). We hold that the defendant, John Smith, is not liable in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Smith v. Southeastern Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Southeastern Financial Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Legg v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  2. Blackfeet Tribe of Indians v. State of Mont.District Court, D. Montana · 1981
  3. Valley National Bank, Sunnymead v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Tennessee Wildcat Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. F.D.I.C. v. Trans Pacific Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API