Legal Opinion
Smith v. Southeastern Financial Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 10, 1976PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit certified to our Court pursuant to Article 5, Section 140 (b)(3) of the Alabama Constitution, as amended, 1973. The facts and questions certified to this Court are as follows:
"Appellee, Southeastern Financial Corporation (`Southeastern'), instituted this action against Appellant, John Smith (`Smith') for recovery of three worthless checks, together with a reasonable attorney's fee and punitive damages.
"Prior to the events underlying this action, Southeastern entered into a factoring agreement with Danube Carpet Mills, Inc., whereby…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Tolbert v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HammockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- State v. BlasiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Jones v. Freeman's Dairy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ex Parte AllredSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Southeastern Financial Corporation v. John SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- City of St. Petersburg Beach v. JewellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- UNITED HANDICAPPED, ETC. v. Nat. Bank of CommerceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.