Legal Opinion
Munk v. Federal Land Bank of Wichita
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 14, 1986No. 84-1855PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
In accordance with 10th Cir.R. 9(e) and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), this appeal came on for consideration on the briefs and record on appeal.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs of the dismissal of their complaint without prejudice for lack of a substantial federal question. Plaintiffs’ complaints arise from loan transactions between plaintiffs and the Federal Land Bank of Wichita (the Bank) and between plaintiffs and the Farmers Home Administration (FHA).
According to the complaint, on April 15, 1980, plaintiffs executed a promissory note to the Bank for the principal amount of $118,000. As collateral for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martinez v. WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,902 Donna v. Zabriskie v. Reed D. Lewis and William J. Rogers, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Northridge Bank v. Community Eye Care Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Martinez v. WinnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Strange v. WexlerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA. v. HartelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Brown v. Child Support AdvocatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1994
- Gregory v. Federal Land Bank of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Munk v. Federal Land Bank Of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986