Legal Opinion

Hanzel v. Arter

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 12, 1985No. C-3-82-861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 16) AND SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #17); JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; TERMINATION ENTRY

RICE, District Judge.

I. Facts

This case comes before the Court on stipulated facts (Doc. # 14) and cross motions for summary judgment (Docs. # 16, 17). The New Lebanon Board of Education is the sole Defendant remaining in this action, the individual Defendants having been dismissed at the request of Plaintiffs. (Doc. # 12).

The basis of controversy herein is the application and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fallon v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center of Southeastern PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  2. Clonlara, Inc. v. RunkelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
  3. Amos v. Lampo Group, LLC, TheDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
  4. Doescher v. AragonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. Lawhead v. Brookwood Management Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API