Hanzel v. Arter
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 16) AND SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #17); JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, District Judge.
I. Facts
This case comes before the Court on stipulated facts (Doc. # 14) and cross motions for summary judgment (Docs. # 16, 17). The New Lebanon Board of Education is the sole Defendant remaining in this action, the individual Defendants having been dismissed at the request of Plaintiffs. (Doc. # 12).
The basis of controversy herein is the application and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fallon v. Mercy Catholic Medical Center of Southeastern PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Clonlara, Inc. v. RunkelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
- Amos v. Lampo Group, LLC, TheDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023
- Doescher v. AragonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Lawhead v. Brookwood Management Company, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023