Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1973No. 7319SC451PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The affidavit supporting the issuance of the search warrant reads as follows:

“David Marshall, Special Agent, SBI, being duly sworn and examined under oath, says under oath that he has probable cause to believe that Dwight Symonds has on his premises certain property, to wit: Lysergic acid diethylamide, the possession of which is a crime, to wit: possession for the purpose of distribution of a controlled substance, included in Schedule I of the North Carolina Controlled Substance Act. The property described above is located on the premises described as follows: Top apartment of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. United States v. Ernest Earl SterlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. AkelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API