Legal Opinion
Nichols v. City of Dallas
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 12, 1961No. 15894PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIXON, Chief Justice.
Appellants Weeden B. Nichols and seven other property owners as plaintiffs brought this suit for permanent injunction against appellees City of Dallas and Ray Cummings, City Building Inspector, charging that Ordinance No. 8289, enacted December 7, 19S9, rezoning certain property by special permit, is unconstitutional and is also illegal and invalid for other reasons.
Daniel Gevinson and Jesuit High School of Dallas, Inc., intervened as owners respectively of the equitable and legal title to the real property primarily affected.
The property, about 21 acres in extent, is…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- State Ex Rel. Saveland Park Holding Corp. v. WielandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- MODDY v. City of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ex Parte GranvielCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- State v. RhineCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Masquelette v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- McWhorter v. City of WinnsboroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Midway Protective League v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.