Legal Opinion

Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley v. Cadle Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1996No. 95-T-5336PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Presiding Judge.

Appellant, Cadle Company, appeals from a judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas ordering execution on a New Mexico judgment for appellee, Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley. 1

In 1990, appellee, a legal partnership, sued appellant for legal fees in the Fifth District Judicial Court, Chaves County, New Mexico. A jury verdict was rendered in favor of appellee for $66,367.60. Thereafter, appellant filed an appeal to the Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Appellant failed to pay and the judgment was subsequently domesticated in the Trumbull County Court of Common…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinkle, Cox, Eaton, Coffield & Hensley v. Cadle Co. of Ohio, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Zwick & Zwick v. Suburban Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Signal Data Processing, Inc. v. Rex Humbard FoundationOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Doser v. Savage Manufacturing & Sales, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. T & R Properties, Inc. v. WimberlyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State of Maine v. SEKAP, CIGARETTENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  3. Higgs v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Technology Renewal Corporation v. Houghton, Unpublished Decision (3-27-2001)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API