Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Baird

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 21, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit, on a promissory note. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Vermilion County; the Hon. Ferdinand Bookwalter, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wall

This controversy has been here twice before. (53 Ill. App. 211, 61 Id. 72.)

On the last trial the plaintiff recovered against Baird and Bennett the amount due on the note, $1,976.88, and the latter prosecutes the present appeal. It is assigned as error that the court refused a change of venue asked by Bennett and Green. It does not appear from the bill of exceptions that any notice of the application was given. The clerk has copied, among the orders and files of the case, a paper purporting to contain such notice and service thereof, but it can not be so preserved.

The point must therefore be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Green v. BairdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Altube v. AguirreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Le Fevere v. WatsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  3. People v. HavillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API