Legal Opinion

United States v. Wolff, Tristan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 21, 1997No. 96-3145PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Appellant, seeking review of the district court’s judgment imposing a sentence of 84 months, alleges errors in enhancement, and in the denial of a three-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility. Appellant also argues that he is entitled to resentencing because the government breached its plea agreement with him. The government concedes the breach, but differs with the defendant as to its effect. Because we agree with the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. Raymond RobinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Jonathan Jay PollardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Thomas J. BowlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. VanDamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. St. James v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. State v. BrachtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Thompson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API