State v. Lee
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtGartzke, P.J.
The state appeals from an order suppressing Scott Lee’s inculpatory statement. He is charged with conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance, contrary to secs. 939.31 and 161.41 (1) (b), Stats. The issues are whether the police may constitutionally initiate interrogation of a defendant after he has invoked his right to counsel and whether defendant’s stepmother acted for the police when she persuaded him to inculpate himself. The trial court found that the stepmother had acted on behalf of the state and suppressed the statement because defendant’s communication to the officers was therefore…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. KruseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BoggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- Davis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. LangeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
- State v. LeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- State v. LangeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990