School District v. Enterprise Natural Gas Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 89, April T., 1901, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Armstrong Co., March Term, 1901, No. 131, on bill in equity in case of School District of Free-port Borough v. Enterprise Natural Gas Company. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Patton, P. J. The facts are stated at length in the opinion of the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 89, April T., 1901, by defendant, from decree of C. P. Armstrong Co., March Term, 1901, No. 131, on bill in equity in case of School District of Free-port Borough v. Enterprise Natural Gas Company. Bill in equity for an injunction. Before Patton, P. J. The facts are stated at length in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court entered the following decree : And now, August 14, 1900, the Enterprise Natural Gas Company, its officers, agents, workmen and employees are enjoined and restrained from shutting off or discontinuing the supply of natural gas for fuel, or heating the…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
W. D. Porter, J.,
It is unnecessary to consider in detail the numerous specifications of error: the decree entered by the learned court below was fully warranted by the undisputed facts. The following facts explicitly alleged in the bill, were not traversed by the answer and were admitted to be true upon the argument of this appeal,, viz: on February 1,1892,- the council of the borough of Freeport passed an ordinance granting George Poterie, his successors or assigns, the privilege of opening the streets and alleys in said borough and laying pipes therein for the purpose of conveying…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adams v. KuehnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Delp v. Bartholomay Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Wright v. Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Norristown v. Norristown Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Allegheny City v. People's Natural Gas & Pipeage Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cochranton Borough v. Cochranton Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909