Norristown v. Norristown Passenger Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 180 and 181, Jan. T., 1892, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., March T., 1890, Nos. 31 and 33, for defendants, non obstante veredicto. Assumpsit to recover the cost of repaving streets. In these cases the court below directed a verdict for the plaintiff, reserving the question as to whether there was any evidence in the case under which the plaintiff could recover.
Read the full summary
Appeals, Nos. 180 and 181, Jan. T., 1892, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., March T., 1890, Nos. 31 and 33, for defendants, non obstante veredicto. Assumpsit to recover the cost of repaving streets. In these cases the court below directed a verdict for the plaintiff, reserving the question as to whether there was any evidence in the case under which the plaintiff could recover. Subsequently, on motion for a new trial and judgment non obstante veredicto the court entered judgment fcjr defendants, We and, J., filing opinions as follows : Norristown v. Norristown Passenger…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We affirm this judgment upon the opinion of the learned judge of the court below, refusing a new trial.
Norristown v. Citizens Passenger Railway Co.
Per Curiam, March 28, 1892:
We affirm this judgment upon the opinion of the learned judge of the court below, refusing a new trial.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Philadelphia v. Holmes Electric Protective Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- City of Madison v. Southern Wisconsin Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- H. A. Steen Industries, Inc. v. CavanaughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- City of Philadelphia v. Hestonville, Mantua & Fairmount Passenger RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.