Legal Opinion

In re Holmes – Per Curiam (

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 4, 2018No. 118310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a contested original proceeding in discipline filed by the office of the Disciplinary Administrator against respondent, Curtis N. Holmes, of De Soto, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Kansas in 2008. After Holmes appeared in person for a hearing before a panel of the Kansas Board for Discipline of Attorneys, the panel unanimously determined he violated Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct (KRPC) 1.4 (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 293) (communication); 1.16(a)(1) (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 333) (withdrawing from representation); 5.5(a) (2018 Kan. S. Ct. R. 363) (unauthorized practice of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re DennisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  2. In re LoberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  3. In Re FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. In re MintzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. In re CureSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. In re DanielsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  4. In re HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API