Reed v. Gross

This matter comes before me on a motion to dismiss the bill of complaint as to the defendant Isaac Gross. I feel that the motion should prevail.

The allegations of fraud, on the part of Isaac Gross, as stated in the bill, violates the provisions of rule 47 of this court, in that the particulars of the alleged fraud are not expressed in the complaint. That is a serious omission. Gorlin v. CameoTheatres, Inc., 122 N.J. Eq. 175; Schuler v. Southern Iron andSteel Co., 77 N.J. Eq. 60.

Further, the bill of complaint fails to state that Isaac Gross, as agent of the Modern Medical Associates, obtained…