Marino v. New York Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to examine a disclaimer of liability and denial of insurance coverage based on the failure of an insured to report timely the accident giving rise to the personal injury claim involved.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Leisure, J., granting a declaratory judgment in favor of Demour Construction Co. (Demour), the general contractor at the scene of the construction accident underlying this appeal. The district court declared that appellant Peerless Insurance Co. (Peerless)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Allstate Insurance v. GrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- In re the Arbitration between Sentry Insurance & AmselNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- George Muhlstock & Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Ogden Corp. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Broadway National Bank v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Ebrahimian v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Suffolk Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Christopher Marino v. New York Telephone Company Demour Construction Company Jamco Construction Company, and Romal Iron Works, Inc., New York Telephone Company and Demour Construction Company, Third-Party-Plaintiffs v. Empire Erecting Corp. Romal Iron Works, Inc., and Jamco Construction Company, Third-Party-Defendants. Demour Construction Company, Second-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellee v. Peerless Insurance Company, Second-Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant. New York Telephone Company and Demour Construction Company, Fourth-Party-Plaintiffs v. Electrical Motors Corp., Fourth-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991