Legal Opinion

In Re Daoud

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1976No. Crim. 19156PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Patricia Daoud, alleging that the superior court revoked her probation after the term of that probation had expired, seeks a writ of habeas corpus. The essential inquiry is whether an order modifying the original probation order extended the term of that probation. We conclude that petitioner’s claim lacks merit, and thus deny the writ.

On February 8, 1973, following her plea of nolo contendere to a charge of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1), petitioner was sentenced to one year in the county jail. The court suspended the execution of sentence and placed petitioner on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re CandelarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In re GriffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. In re WimbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. KaramanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In Re BakkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. DePaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. MedeirosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API