Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Tarver

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 21, 1978PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant Barnes brought a negligence action against Tarver for personal injuries. Barnes, a pedestrian, was hit by an automobile driven by Tarver.

Tarver was uninsured. Barnes is insured under his insurance policy issued by American Motorist Insurance Company, and under an insurance policy issued by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company to Poole Truck Line, Inc.

Barnes amended his complaint to add American Motorist and Liberty Mutual, Appellees, as additional parties defendant seeking to recover under the uninsured motorist provisions of the policies. After answering the complaint, the two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Inc. v. GriffinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Aetna Ins. v. HannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Oliver v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. Poole v. WILLIAM PENN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Ogle v. LongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Lady Corinne Trawlers, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Zaden v. ElkusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Brown v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API