Legal Opinion
Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Federal Land Bank
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 11, 1937No. 8 Div. 755PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This suit was begun as an interpleader in equity by Commonwealth Insurance Company against W. R. Terry, Federal Land Bank and Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company, and others not necessary here to mention. Its equity and some equitable rights were declared on a former appeal. Commonwealth Ins. Co. v. Terry, 230 Ala. 125, 159 So. 822.
In so far as this appeal is concerned, it is only necessary to say that it affects claims between the Liverpool & London &r Globe Insurance Company and the Federal Land Bank, primarily, and Terry and the others secondarily.
Briefly stated,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Aetna Ins. v. HannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Emens v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Tarrant Land Co. v. Palmetto Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Lambert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Barnes v. TarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Alexander City v. Continental Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Olive v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984