Legal Opinion

Newby v. Haltaman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Johnson. Tried below before the Hon. Charles Soward.

1Opinion of the Court

Reeves, Associate Justice.

Appellees claim the land described in their petition as heirs at law of Abraham Haltaman, deceased.

They produced and read in evidence on the trial a patent from the Republic of Texas to Isaac Saunders for 1,280 acres of land, bearing date February 11, 1846, and a deed of conveyance from Saunders to Abraham Haltaman dated March 10, 1846.

The heirship of appellees being admitted on the trial, the questions in the case relate to the patent to Saunders and the conveyance from him to Abraham Haltaman, and to appellees’ right to recover in this suit by virtue of the patent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stroud v. SpringfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Pridgen v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Mapes v. Leal's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Cocke v. E. P. Calkin & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ammons v. DwyerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cox v. CockTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Dawson v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Kimmell v. Burnet County Appraisal DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Baylor v. TillebachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API