Legal Opinion

Frizzell v. Murray

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2013No. 87927-3PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 Respondent Tamara Frizzell received a $100,000 loan from petitioner Barbara Murray, secured by a deed of trust on Frizzell’s home. Frizzell defaulted, and a nonjudicial foreclosure sale was set. Before the sale, Frizzell filed an action against Barbara and her husband, Gregory Murray, alleging several claims as well as a motion for an order to enjoin the sale. A judge stayed the sale, conditioned on Frizzell’s payment of $25,000 into the court registry by the following morning. Frizzell failed to do so, and the sale took place. The trial court then dismissed Frizzell’s claims on summary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Klem v. Washington Mutual BankWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cox v. HeleniusWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Dreiling v. JainWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Dreiling v. JainWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Plein v. LackeyWashington Supreme Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. 4518 S. 256th, LLC v. Karen L. Gibbon, PSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Lee v. Metro Parks TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Merry v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Christine Lee v. Metro ParksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Linda Ames v. Hsbc BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API