Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Perron

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2001No. 43A05-0105-CV-184PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge

Bruce Davidson appeals a grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Elkhart (the City), as well as certain discovery rulings issued by the trial court. Specifically, Davidson presents the following restated issues for review:

1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in granting the appellees' motion to strike the affidavit of Carol McDowell?

2. Did the trial court err in limiting discovery by Davidson?

3. Did the trial court err in granting summary judgment in favor of the City concerning claims arising under 42 U.S.C. § 19837?

We affirm. 1

This case has come…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Vernon v. Kroger Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cliver v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Wright v. ElstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Sharon Wright and Leslie Wright v. Anthony E. Miller, D.P.M., and Achilles Podiatry GroupIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Estate of Lee Ex Rel. McGarrah v. Lee & Urbahns Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Delta Airlines v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API