Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1985No. Docket Nos. F002620, F002714, F003146PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RITCHEY, J. *

The present case represents the consolidated appeals of four defendants: Billy Kenneth Turner, Mark Anthony Hinojos, Michael Miguel Renteria, and Paul Anthony Lopez.

In an information filed in Tulare County Superior Court in March 1983, defendants Turner and Hinojos were charged with multiple violations of the Penal Code: 1 count I, section 211 (robbery); count II, section 459 (burglary). It was also alleged that during the commission and attempted commission of these offenses, defendants were armed within the meaning of section 12022, subdivision (a). In the third count of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. People v. MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Sanchez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  5. County of Contra Costa v. Humore, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API