Legal Opinion
People v. Mayer
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 22, 1987No. B016480PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J. *
In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, appellant James Michael Mayer was charged in count I with possession of cocaine for the purpose of sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351) and in count II with possession of marijuana for the purpose of sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359). Following denial of appellant’s motions pursuant to Penal Code sections 995, 1531 and 1538.5, appellant pleaded guilty to the charge in count I of possession of cocaine for the purpose of sale. Appellant was placed on probation for five years, with the first year to be…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. SandlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. GlenosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. GesnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.