Sumida v. Yumen
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.
The debtor-appellants (hereafter the debtors) filed in the district court a petition for a real property arrangement, under Chapter XII of the Bankruptcy Act §§ 401-526, 11 U.S.C. §§ 801-926 (1964), as amended, (Supp. Ill 1968). On motion of the creditor-appellees (hereafter the creditors) the district court dismissed the Chapter XII petition. This appeal followed.1
QUESTION
The question presented is whether a District Court may dismiss a Chapter XII proceeding for lack of good faith on the debtor’s part in filing and lack of debtors’ ability to effectuate the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. American Bond & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Federal Facilities Realty Trust v. KulpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
- Potts v. PottsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Chicago Bank of Commerce v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Victory Const. Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981
- Kern Oil & Refining Co., Plaintiff/counter-Defendant/appellee v. Tenneco Oil Company, Defendant/counter-Claimant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Dutch Flat Investment Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1980
- Alan E. Davis v. United States of America, Lt. Col. R. E. StoffeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.