Legal Opinion

Rudd v. Kingsland

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 16, 1951No. C. A. 2863-49PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PINE, District Judge.

This is an action under 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, R.S. 4915, to authorize the Commissioner of Patents to issue letters patent.

At the hearing plaintiff announced that he relied on three claims, namely 3, 5, and 7. They are drawn to a medicinal preparation for external application and the method of making it. It is intended for treatment of abrasions, bruises, and sores. It is obtained by dropping sulphuric acid into an agitated mixture of cod liver oil, turpentine, and oil of bergamot and then filtering the solution to obtain the filtrate. It is alleged that the composition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re OberwegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. KayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
  3. In re TrattnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1929
  4. In re SussmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re NovakCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API