Legal Opinion

United States v. Smairat

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 8, 2007No. 05 CR 168PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LEFKOW, District Judge.

Defendant Nabil Smairat (“Nabil”) is charged with wire fraud and money laundering and his property is the subject of a forfeiture allegation. See Indictment, Dkt. No. 1; 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343, 1957, 2; 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c); 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C). Nabil has moved under Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 41(h) and 12(b)(3)(C) to suppress evidence that was seized during a search of his home, including documents, currency, and other tangible objects. On June 1, 2006, this court granted Nabil’s request for an evidentiary hearing to determine…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Kenneth M. SobczakWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Kenneth M. SobczakWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. Kenneth M. SobczakWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API