State v. Roffler
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1DissentWise, Presiding Judge
I disagree with the conclusion that the trial court properly dismissed the indictments against the Rofflers. For the reasons set forth herein, I also note that it was inappropriate for the trial court to dismiss the indictments against the Rof-flers with prejudice.
Because the matter had not yet been to trial and the State had not yet had an opportunity to present evidence, the indictments were not fatally flawed, as the trial court found. Rather, at that point in time, at most, the indictments were merely voidable because they did not sufficiently identify the property the Rofflers allegedly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sullens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- State v. McClainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Ex Parte BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- State v. FosterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.