Sagan ex rel. Registered Voters v. Pennsylvania Public Television Network
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*566OPINION OF THE COURT
STOUT, Justice.
Cyril E. Sagan, a legally qualified candidate for the United States Senate in the May 20, 1986, Pennsylvania primary election, filed, in the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, a pro se “Complaint for Malicious Acts and Malicious Process to Knowingly and Wilfully Deny Plaintiff and Voters of the Commonwealth Their Rights as Set forth Under Pennsylvania Statutes and The Constitutions of Pennsylvania and of the United States of America.” 1 He complained of his exclusion from a televised debate of candidates, aired over public television stations, in which two…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wortex Mills, Inc. v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Padlock Ranch, Inc. v. Washakie Needles Irr. Dist.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014