Legal Opinion
In re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 14, 2014No. Master File No. 06-0620; Nos. 06-0638; 06-0657; 06-0677; 06-0861; 06-0932; 06-1464; 06-1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
Among the many motions now pending before me in this antitrust litigation is a motion seeking reconsideration of nay March 26, 2009 decision addressing plaintiffs claims under § 1 of the Sherman Act.1 Dkt. No. 513. Moving defendants were individual members and affiliates of the former Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative (EMMC).2 For the following reasons, I will deny moving defendants’ request for reconsideration3 and will certify my Order for appeal.
BACKGROUND
The Capper-Volstead Act provides certain agricultural cooperatives "with a limit*385ed exemption from…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Lazaridis v. WehmerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Blystone v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Mushroom Direct Purchaser Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC. v. EASTERN MUSHROOM MARKETING COOPERATIVE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC. v. EASTERN MUSHROOM MARKETING COOPERATIVE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021