Bankers Insurance Co. v. Florida Department of Insurance & Treasurer
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BARFIELD, Chief Judge.
We AFFIRM the trial court’s finding that no attorney-client relation privilege exists as to the documents and communications between the appellant, attorney Edwin Blanton, and the private investigator hired by Blanton to investigate an employee of the Department of Insurance, because no attorney-client relationship existed between appellant and Blan-ton with respect to this investigation, rather, Blanton was a “conduit” for the appellant. We AFFIRM the trial court’s finding that no work-product doctrine or private investigator privilege was established for the documents…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Milinazzo v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- 1550 Brickell Associates v. Q.B.E. InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
- Tri-State Outdoor Media Group, Inc. v. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors to Tri-State Outdoor Media Group, Inc. (In Re Tri-State Outdoor Media Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2002
- 1550 Brickell Associates v. Q.B.E. InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009