Legal Opinion
1550 Brickell Associates v. Q.B.E. Insurance
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided October 20, 2008No. 07-22283-CIV-LENARD/GARBERPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BARRY L. GARBER, United States Magistrate Judge.
THIS ORDER resolves a continuing discovery dispute between QBE Insurance and 1550 Brickell Associates. The question at issue is whether QBE has correctly claimed work-product immunity or attorney-client privilege for the documents in its privilege log.
Work Product
The concept of work-product immunity arises from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3), which limits the discovery of documents prepared in anticipation of litigation. By its terms, the rule does not protect documents prepared in the ordinary course of business. Regrettably, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harper v. Auto-Owners InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
- Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. DeasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Milinazzo v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
- Bankers Insurance Co. v. Florida Department of Insurance & TreasurerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
3Cited by13 opinions
- Maplewood Partners, L.P. v. Indian Harbor InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Preferred Care Partners Holding Corp. v. Humana, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Allstate Insurance v. LevesqueDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
- Maharaj v. GEICO Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Bivins v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.