Legal Opinion
Farley v. Baird, Patrick & Co., Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 19, 1990No. 90 Civ. 2168 (MBM)PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff has sued defendants under Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, § 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77l, RICO, 18 U.S.C. § 1962, and state law based on alleged overcharges for commissions on his purchases of over-the-counter stock. Defendants have moved to dismiss, raising a host of issues including the statute of limitations, the reach of § 12(2), failure to plead fraud with particularity and failure otherwise to state a claim. As set forth below, the motion based on the statute of limitations is granted in part and denied in…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In Re Integrated Resources Real Estate Ltd. Partnerships Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In Re AES Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- In re Amerifirst Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
- Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. KapoorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Bank of Denver v. Southeastern Capital Group, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.