People v. Jones

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant’s sentence is unduly harsh or severe. In light of defendant’s lengthy criminal history and the circumstances of the various crimes for which defendant was convicted, we see no reason to disturb the sentence. Defendant raises several other contentions in his pro se supplemental brief, none of which has merit. Defendant was provided meaningful representation (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147). Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is not preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). The…