Legal Opinion
People v. Martuzas
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 2, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court did not err in denying the motion of defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty. The record supports the conclusions that defendant *929understood the terms of the plea agreement and that the plea was entered knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily (see, People v Ayers [appeal No. 1], 192 AD2d 1134, Iv denied 81 NY2d 1069; People v Bowden, 186 AD2d 362).
The court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request that the court recuse itself (see, People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405-406). Absent a legal disqualification under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MorenoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. AlnuttAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. MichalekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. AyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Martuzas v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- People v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997