Legal Opinion

People v. Carder

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 8, 1916No. Crim. No. 355. Third Appellate DistrictPublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

Defendant was convicted of the larceny of a calf, and he appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

Among the alleged errors, the most serious is involved in certain remarks to the jury made by the trial judge. It seems that after the case was submitted the jury returned into court at 3:35 P. M. on Friday, and asked to have certain evidence read to them. This was done and they again retired. A few hours later they returned to the courtroom and the foreman informed the presiding judge that in his opinion the jury could not agree. The trial judge then said: “Ton must…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ConboyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. People v. KindlebergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. BaumgartnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API