Legal Opinion

Newcomer v. Kean

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 1, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Carroll County. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This is an action by husband and wife, for slanderous words spoken of the ivife.- The words laid in the declaration are actionable per se, and it was necessary therefore that both should join in the suit.

The wife could not sue alone, because of her disability as feme covert, and because the husband is entitled to the judgment. Nor could the husband sue alone, because the foundation of the action is the injury to the wife, and his rights are therefore secondary only and derivative through the marital relation, and should he die before payment of the judgment, the wife would be entitled to it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Throgmorton v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1834

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Newman v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Anderson v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
  3. Clark v. WoottonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  4. Farrell v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Horton v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API