Pence v. Slate
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Concurrence
LUNDSTEN, P.J. (concurring).
¶49 I write separately to point out that, to my mind, the supreme court's opinion in MacLeish v. Boardman & Clark LLP , 2019 WI 31, --- Wis. 2d ----, --- N.W.2d ----, issued March 26, 2019, brings into question a holding in Tensfeldt v. Haberman , 2009 WI 77, 319 Wis. 2d 329, 768 N.W.2d 641.
¶50 In his pre-MacLeish briefing on appeal, Attorney Slate contended, in effect, that the particulars of the allegations against him did not matter because none of his allegedly negligent behavior involved the drafting or execution of the trust document. Attorney Slate argued…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Auric v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts & Letters v. First Wisconsin National Bank of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Tensfeldt v. HabermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Beauchamp v. KemmeterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
- David MacLeish v. Boardman & Clark LLPWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019