State v. Dowdy
Missouri Court of Appeals
1DissentNancy Steffen Rahmeyer, Presiding Judge
I respectfully dissent. If we consider the facts in the light most favorable to the ruling, as we must under our standard of review, I would find no exception to the warrant requirement applies to this case. The trial court found that “[ajbsent case authority from the [Supreme Court of the United States] or an appeals court in Missouri approving the taking of a blood sample in a non-DWI case,” and declined to approve the practice. While the majority opinion states, “[v]arious Missouri cases, only one of which was cited to the trial court and then only in passing, indicate that it was error to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.