Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Dowdy

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 19, 2011No. SD 30381Published

1DissentNancy Steffen Rahmeyer, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent. If we consider the facts in the light most favorable to the ruling, as we must under our standard of review, I would find no exception to the warrant requirement applies to this case. The trial court found that “[ajbsent case authority from the [Supreme Court of the United States] or an appeals court in Missouri approving the taking of a blood sample in a non-DWI case,” and declined to approve the practice. While the majority opinion states, “[v]arious Missouri cases, only one of which was cited to the trial court and then only in passing, indicate that it was error to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API