Legal Opinion

Searles v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 23, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hendrickson, J.

The plaintiffs in this case, who are husband and wife, brought suit against the defendant company for damages resulting from a collision between a carriage in which the wife was riding and the defendant’s trolley car. The carriage was overturned and the wife sustained severe bruises of the head, limbs and spinal column. The trial was had at the Union Circuit and the jury awarded as damages to the wife $12,000, and to the husband $3,000. A rule to show cause was allowed by the trial judge. The grounds relied on in the application for a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New Jersey Electric Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. Woodland v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fishleigh v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Payne v. Waterloo, Cedar Falls & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  3. Smith v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Chicago City Railway Co. v. NonnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API