Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Denholm & McKay Co. v. United States Board of Tax Appeals

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 9, 1942No. 7817PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VINSON, Associate Justice.

The relator, appellant here, prayed for a writ of prohibition in the District Court directed to the Board of Tax Appeals, to prevent the Board from issuing a new order based upon a new opinion1 which reverses a previous decision in appellant’s favor.2 Appellant concludes that the writ can be granted because it believes that the Board clearly has lost jurisdiction of its case. The District Court, however, granted the Board’s motion to dismiss.

The complaint states: Appellant received a deficiency notice. It appealed to the Board. The Commissioner answered. Whereupon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Denholm & McKay Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
  3. United States Board of Tax Appeals v. United States ex rel. McCandlessCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
  4. Porter v. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  5. United States ex rel. Lang Body Co. of Delaware v. Board of Tax AppealsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Churchill Farms, Inc. v. OrrDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
  2. Murray Energy Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  3. State of West Virginia v. EPACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  4. State of West Virginia v. EPACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API