Legal Opinion

Smith v. Higgins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 6, 1939No. 173PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff filed his income tax return for 1932 with the Collector of Internal Revenue for the Third District of New York and therein claimed a deduction for a loss sustained on the sale of securities to Innisfail Corporation on December 29, 1932. Pie also claimed a deduction for a loss sustained on the sale of certain securities to his wife on the same date. Both deductions were disallowed; a deficiency in income taxes for 1932, based on the dis-allowances, was determined; and a fraud penalty was assessed. The plaintiff paid the amount of the deficiency, penalty and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Burnet v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Dalton v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Helvering v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. National Investors Corporation v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Helvering v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  5. Wickwire v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API