Brusco v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The controversy in this workmen’s compensation case boils down to a single and plain issue of fact, viz., whether the appellant-employee, Vincent Brusco, has been suffering since October 30, 1937, any disability attributable to a head and ear injury accidentally sustained by him on February 8, 1937, during the course of his employment as a car cleaner with the appelleetransit company, and, if so, the extent of his disability.

Following the accident of February 8, 1937, the parties executed and the board approved an open agreement for compensation for total disability.…