Legal Opinion
Lamson v. Martin
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 20, 1893PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
This is a bill in equity, brought by the plaintiffs and prosecuted in their names for the benefit of the Lamson Consolidated Store Service Company. The prayer of the bill is, in substance, that the defendants may be restrained from manufacturing, selling, or leasing a certain cash-carrier apparatus manufactured by them, and that they may be ordered to transfer the patent to the Martin and Hill Cash-carrier Company, to whose rights the Lamson Company has succeeded.
It appears that, prior to December, 1887, the defendant Martin had invented a cash-carrier system for which, and for certain…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Coffin v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jamesbury Corporation v. Worcester Valve Company, Inc. v. E. W. Bliss Company, IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- National Development Co. v. GrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Burton v. Burton Stock Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Reddi-Wip, Inc. v. Lemay Valve CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Andreaggi v. RelisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.