Blasengame v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the sale and possession of marijuana in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, and he appeals.
1. In his first and third enumerations of error, appellant contends he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because of a conflict of interest created by his trial counsel’s representation of both appellant and his co-defendant, Ray Abernathy, at their joint trial, and thus, it was error to deny his motion for a new trial on that ground. There is nothing in the transcript to indicate a conflict arising from such dual representation, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Tolbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Hamilton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Capers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989