Legal Opinion

Riley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 2, 1989No. A89A0613PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Appellant Curtis Riley and co-defendant David Siler were tried jointly and convicted by a jury of the offense of trafficking in cocaine. Riley appeals, enumerating as error the denial of his motion for new trial.

1. Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, contending that the State failed to show that he was in “actual possession” of cocaine as was then required by OCGA § 16-13-31 (a). See Lockwood v. State, 257 Ga. 796 (364 SE2d 574) (1988). We disagree. “The ‘actual possession’ required by OCGA § 16-13-31 to authorize a conviction for trafficking refers not merely to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lockwood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  3. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Cochran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Christopher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boatwright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Romano v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Bennett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Garmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API