Legal Opinion

Tanuvasa v. City and County of Honolulu

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1981No. 6891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

626 P.2d 1175 (1981)

Onasai TANUVASA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation, and Officer David Lam, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 6891.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

April 16, 1981.

Reconsideration Denied May 5, 1981.

Certiorari Granted May 26, 1981.

David C. Schutter, Honolulu, for plaintiff-appellee.

Stanley Young, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Honolulu, for City.

Wayne A. Matsuura, Burgess & Matsuura, Waianae, for Lam.

Before HAYASHI, C.J., and PADGETT and BURNS, JJ.

PADGETT, Judge.

Appellants City and County of Honolulu and David Lam appeal from a judgment below…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Robert I. Powell v. Eugene M. ZuckertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  3. Turner v. WillisHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. CrossWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Governing Board v. MetcalfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ailetcher v. BENEFICIAL FINANCE CO., ETC.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Loevsky v. CarterHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Makani Development Co. v. StahlHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API